How would YOU end the world?

[Pip Boy]

Wouldn't people... y'know.... just.. stop doin' it?

EDIT: I think I'd hijack a Space Shuttle (Who would see it coming?) And then fly it into space with a nuclear weapon onboard. Take it to the moon and then plant the bomb on the side of the moon that leads its revolution. Detonating the bomb there will hopefully slow the moon enough that it begins to accelerate towards the earth until it finally comes crashing down. The best part is that it will be a slow sing towards the ground. Could take days, weeks, or even months of watching the moon slowly grow bigger and bigger as the tital patters turn to chaos and weather goes crazy until the moment of final impact. Some Majora's Mask shit right there.

[Flarecobra]

Originally Posted by Megaman FTW

Wouldn't people... y'know.... just.. stop doin' it?

EDIT: I think I'd hijack a Space Shuttle (Who would see it coming?) And then fly it into space with a nuclear weapon onboard. Take it to the moon and then plant the bomb on the side of the moon that leads its revolution. Detonating the bomb there will hopefully slow the moon enough that it begins to accelerate towards the earth until it finally comes crashing down. The best part is that it will be a slow sing towards the ground. Could take days, weeks, or even months of watching the moon slowly grow bigger and bigger as the tital patters turn to chaos and weather goes crazy until the moment of final impact. Some Majora's Mask shit right there.

Physics disagree with ya there.

Anyway, I'd pull some Wargames stuff, and hack into the Nuclear Launch Systems, and just fire them off, not really caring where they land. Just aim them in a random direction and let them fly. Then other countries would retalite, and MAD would occur.

The survivers would slowly meet their end as they struggle to make it though the nuclear winter.

[Karrrrrrrrrrrresche]

Flood of Cheeseburgers.

[bluestarultor]

I say it ends in ice. :p


Really, though, are we talking the end of the world or the end of humanity? The two aren't necessarily mutually inclusive. I say give it enough time and humanity ends both pretty effectively. All we have to do is keep doing what we are and global warming will eventually fry us, especially if we reduce particle emissions and stop blotting out the sun with global dimming. That should about unleash all the methane stored in the oceans and tundra and send us not just falling, but rocketing over the edge at breakneck speed into a fast death spiral.

Now, if we somehow manage to compensate with, I dunno, building a LOT of infrastructure really fast to save as many plants and animals as possible, humanity as a whole will probably be screwed, but a select few would survive and re-populate eventually, despite the loss of pretty much all wildlife. Highly unlikely, but I'll allow it.

In that case, the world is still pretty effectively ended. What with basically knocking the legs out from under the table.

[Daimo Mac, The Blue Light of Hope]

Oh oh oh I know how to end humanity. Get a recording of all of Bluey's posts and record them to the masses. Mass suicide for all

Bluey ya know I am kidding right. We still cool.
:p

[Hanuman]

Hard question, I'd probably say that the best ending ever would probably be if the world suddenly got the same physics as Valhalla and every second hour (every first would be feasting) we play musical chairs, but instead of sitting down we'd have killing that feels like getting hit with 20lbs of awesome fun, and each city has one loser every hour that just doesn't get revived, everyone else pops back up, feasts, then we go back out and do it again and again until only two survive.

THEN

Everyone else raises back up and we have the most awesome tournament ever, then we have nationals and world wide, then we all fly to mars and blow up earth. Screw earth.