|
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#21 |
SOM3WH3R3
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,606
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Oh yeah? Well, Jesus was a scientist!
He totally was. He found a way to circumvent preservation of mass and energy. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Keeper of the new
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: A place without judgment
Posts: 4,506
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Nuh-uh! You have to submit data to peer review and stuff to be a scientist. Jesus did it the hardcore way: With magic.
__________________
Hope insistent, trust implicit, love inherent, life immersed |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
SOM3WH3R3
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,606
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Why do you hate jesus?
Also, why do you hate Atomic Robo. Even if Jesus wasn't a scientist, Atomic Robo is. He's such a scientist. He's, like, a double scientist. With a side order of badass. Heh, he could totally kick you ass. And Garfunkle's as well! And Simon's! So who are you to question Atomic Robo-Jesus? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
formerly known as Prince.
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Right here, with you >:)
Posts: 2,396
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Being against science is like being against knowledge. Literally.
Knowledge in itself is pretty useless. But if you're smart enough to use that knowledge you can do all kindsa things. Cool things, and not so cool things. That being said: Science took my faith in humanity.
__________________
>:( C-:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Sent to the cornfield
|
![]() Quote:
Actually are you claiming that all subjects were aren't science aren't knowledge? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Sent to the cornfield
|
![]()
Latin is the language of barbarians.
And if we're going to play that game science really means "to dissect things" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
SOM3WH3R3
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,606
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Hey, the literal translation of "nuclear" is, I believe "nut-based" (from "nux"), but it can still screw you over pretty badly. Or help you, depending on your use of it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Sent to the cornfield
|
![]()
That cause it refers to the center of an atom- the nut if you will.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
SOM3WH3R3
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,606
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Yeah, I'm aware of that. But your point seemed to be that science sucks because literally translated, its name is of inferior quality. Whereas I pointed out that the area of science with the least impressive name, is one of the most impressive (read: capable of causing the biggest explosions) areas to exist.
Thus, impressiveness of name is antiproportional to awesomeness of discipline, and thus, by pointing out that science means "to dissect" you have supported our point that science is cool. And there's no fallacy inherent in that train of logic AT ALL so don't even bother looking for one. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|