Yeah, I'm aware of that. But your point seemed to be that science sucks because literally translated, its name is of inferior quality. Whereas I pointed out that the area of science with the least impressive name, is one of the most impressive (read: capable of causing the biggest explosions) areas to exist.
Thus, impressiveness of name is antiproportional to awesomeness of discipline, and thus, by pointing out that science means "to dissect" you have supported our point that science is cool.
And there's no fallacy inherent in that train of logic AT ALL so don't even bother looking for one.
|