D&D 3.5 Thread [Nikose] [Three-for-one]

[tacticslion]

Originally Posted by Nikose Tyris

4 is the right time. When it was just Alain and Aldy that I could see at 4:10, I just shrugged and went to do something else.

Dude! I was totally on! I'm sorry you couldn't see me, 'cause, dude!

Edit: you should know, Nik, that we still love you!
Also: don't feel pressure from us to make it up this week, especially if you're doing your finals!
Everyone: Nik's totes doing his finals this week, so we probably won't make this session up at this time.

Unrelated: everyone should play Dawn of Worlds, at least once. It's a free PnP world-builder game in which an unlimited number of players take on rolls of undefined "gods" who work together, or not, to create, destroy, build, tear asunder, etc, a world from the ground up, including creating races, waging war, altering the terrain, and the like. It's really fun. The end-game purpose is to have a new game-world, like a campaign setting, that everyone knows equally well ('cause they all made it). Alternatively... you can just play the game. Good times, so far. Full disclosure: I'm still in my first game, in the beginning of the third (and final) age. I'm playing an (effectively) lawful good earth goddess (the personification of the world itself) and a (effectively) true neutral god of division, testing, and deep places; my wife is playing a (neutral) good sun goddess, and an (effectively) chaotic neutral trickster god of the sea, wine, and revelry. So far nobody trusts my neutral guy - and with good reason! - as he's the only one that has created and corrupted a race of evil-ish things so far (although he's also created a race of more-or-less good things too, and purified one of his evil cities to neutral, so, you know...). Fun times.

Note: we played two each because it would be too slow to only do one each, as well as to give us a variety of sometimes conflicting alignments and the like. Normally, however, it's just one "god" per player.