My Little Pony: Friendship is Mafia

[Sifright]

Originally Posted by rpgdemon

So, people who haven't posted, why have you not posted? There are a fair number of you, from my rough remembering things.

Before lynching someone who is giving information to us, even if it's an attempt to be misleading, why aren't we taking out people who aren't really interested in the game (And thus won't be too torn up over being the first lynch), and aren't giving us ANYTHING to work on? They're not even helping voting swing in our favor, they're just filling space. The only downside to falsely taking one of them out is that we miss a kill on scum.

Originally Posted by rpgdemon

Killing inactives isn't all positives, it's just low negatives. There's a difference.

It doesn't gives us progress, it just keeps us from killing someone who would be good for the town to have around. And we burn a lynch.

Justification of killing inactives.

Edit: Note Smb was in favour of this tactic and he was scum

[rpgdemon]

Originally Posted by Sifright

Justification of killing inactives.

Edit: Note Smb was in favour of this tactic and he was scum

That's the same thing I just said though, above. In fact, my second quote is almost literally what I said above, and taken extremely out of context.

Someone said that killing inactives was all positives. I responded with, "Killing inactives isn't all positives, it's just low negatives. There's a difference.

It doesn't gives us progress, it just keeps us from killing someone who would be good for the town to have around. And we burn a lynch."

That "And we burn a lynch" was, if I remember correctly, referring to what I said earlier about killing an inactive townie being a bad thing because it's the same as a no-vote.