Mafia Mafia! Also fucking pepper spray.

[Aldurin]

Originally Posted by Nikose Tyris

Aldurin, if there is theoretically a bodyguard in this game, would you allow the theoretical bodyguard to protect himself?

I will not publicly establish a role's function until the end of the game. All information on that will be revealed through flavor text.

[Nikose Tyris]

Eh, I feel covered.

[Geminex]

How so?

[Nikose Tyris]

by BahamutFlare's post.

[Ecks]

I agree that rpg's death looks like a setup to lynch Sif. And as we don't know who targeted who last night, we can't be sure of whose attempt failed. And I refuse to automatically assume scum killed him if we have a Vig and an SK on the loose. I'll UnFoS: Sifright... for now. You might wanna be a little more clear about what you mean when you post from here on out man, because this line:

Originally Posted by Sifright

because a simple trade of doctor or bodyguard to ensure the death of a mafiate is totally the right choice.

Is what had everyone tripping up thinking you were advising we sacrifice our bodyguard. I think you meant it sarcastically maybe? I don't know at this point.

Everyone else is playing their cards pretty close to the chest today... leads are sparse. I don't have anything else to go on right now, but I will keep watching and rereading the thread until I come up with something.

[Ecks]

FoS: Moogle
FoS: Gregness

So guys. Whatcha doin?

[BahamutFlare]

Yeah. Really anything I got on Sif is WIFOM caused by X person that killed RPG. I'd be up for seeing how Moogle, Greg, AND Bookworm.

Ecks, think about it. Mafia has 2-3 people (probably 2) since with a SK, 4 scum and 8 town seems unbalanced. If we sacrifice one person for one person, then it'd be pretty good. However, if we had a counterclaim, then we lynch the liar and get scum. This is the basis behind the comment. A 1 for 1 on D1 is huge! Even D2, a 1 for 1 is pretty good, especially if said bodyguard can just protect himself. Then we get rid of the mafia's mason power.

[Inbred Chocobo]

Vote: Ecks

That is where its at. He be the scum. I have a good idea of who has what role, and Ecks is definitely no roleblocker. I got an idea who was investigator, who is bodyguard, who is roleblocker, and who has an alternative role. Then we had a couple townie deaths as well, and a short list on who is left scum.

So I'm going to post my list one at a time, as if I post the whole thing, whats going to happen is everyone is going to argue the point on who is who and which to go after, and then argue why they are not on the list, so instead we will focus on one person at a time, that way everyone can come into agreement.

[Ecks]

Well gollee gee willickers IC, I'd love to see your reasoning on why I'm scum. You pretty much just threw my vote up there and said "hee hee this guy is scum, and I have a list of other people and who they are too, just trust me on this one guys!"

FoS: Inbred Chocobo

Also, did I ever admit to being the roleblocker? No, that was a suggestion by Nikose that I chose to leave alone rather than confirm or deny. Therefore I will up and admit that no, I am not a roleblocker.

Anyway, @BF: I agree the numbers don't make sense, and the night result post seriously had me worried, because I figured IHMN for scum. Now all I'm left with are the few of us who are active, and I believe your claim and Nikose's, confirming you two as town unless someone counterclaims (which I don't forsee happening at this point). Again, Sif is looking set up at the moment but I'm still a tad suspcious.

That leaves inactives, which plays to my prejudices but again, I'm trying to be fair here. I fingered Greg and Moogle specifically because they have only posted once each, early on day one, and neither have been heard from since.

Then there's mister IC up there waving his big fancy theory in my face, which I'm going to just laugh at, seriously IC back that shit up please.

I also haven't seen any posts from Fenris or Vauron... and Vauron has me curious, because he flipped his vote onto Nikose but didn't detail a reason why. Could be he felt there was reason enough already outlined by earlier posts but then why not at least say that much?

[Gregness]

Originally Posted by Ecks

FoS: Moogle
FoS: Gregness

So guys. Whatcha doin?

Eatin' sandwiches. Having a meltdown about completely botching my semester. But, that's something I'll be bitching about later in the helpstravaganza thread. On to business!

Originally Posted by BahamutFlare

*snip*
Let's ask ourselves too. Why was RPG targeted during the night? Maybe what he was saying at the end of D1 was true. He believed both of our claims. He also was voting Sifright too. He stopped scum from getting a kill on a defensive role, so they didn't want that to happen again. Sif, I think you're getting a little too excited for one vote against you and 1 FoS.

Or maybe it's that he cast the tie vote thus denying town a lynch? Like we've established in at least three prior games that a no-lynch is basically the worst thing for town so it's not surprising to me that the person directly responsible for one would catch some blowback.