The Warring States of NPF  

Go Back   The Warring States of NPF > Social > Playing Games
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Join Chat

 
  Click to unhide all tags.Click to hide all tags.  
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 02-03-2010, 04:13 PM   #11
Solid Snake
Erotic Esquire
 
Solid Snake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,563
Solid Snake didn't even know you could use a corkscrew in that way. Solid Snake didn't even know you could use a corkscrew in that way. Solid Snake didn't even know you could use a corkscrew in that way. Solid Snake didn't even know you could use a corkscrew in that way. Solid Snake didn't even know you could use a corkscrew in that way. Solid Snake didn't even know you could use a corkscrew in that way. Solid Snake didn't even know you could use a corkscrew in that way. Solid Snake didn't even know you could use a corkscrew in that way. Solid Snake didn't even know you could use a corkscrew in that way. Solid Snake didn't even know you could use a corkscrew in that way. Solid Snake didn't even know you could use a corkscrew in that way.
Send a message via AIM to Solid Snake
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DFM View Post
Solid Snake I read the start of your post but then you said you're not a feminist by any stretch and my brain sort of hemorrhaged and disgust blew out of my eyeballs.
...Am I missing something there? Because to me saying "I'm not a feminist" means "I'm not a card-carrying member of NOW raging against how men are asinine, corrupted forces of destruction, and women are far more intelligent, far more capable and men should be constantly reminded of their evils."

Mind you, I'm basing this largely off a college experience with a feminism class I took then with a professor who raged against men with such vehement frequency and disdain that it was often difficult to even acknowledge the nuggets of truth masked behind her arguments, but, eh.

Also in the context of the point I was making, I mean, I can't imagine arguing "jeez this Gentleman's Club motif and the concept of the Asari Consort is rather ludicrously sexist" is somehow anti-women's rights.

I mean in closing, you may be referring to an early-20th century definition of feminism that now seems largely outdated (if only insofar as absolutely no sane individual argues against that definition of feminism), but I think sometimes people on the internet like to create artificial conflicts out of statements they almost seem to purposely interpret incorrectly. It should have been fairly obvious that I wasn't referring to the same definition of feminism, at any rate, and the existence of multiple definitions of the concept in modern culture is intrinsically understood.
Reading my statement about being offended at the notion of a futuristic Gentleman's Club as somehow blasting women's rights by concentrating exclusively on the one phrase that can be isolated and misinterpreted seems like the kind of behavior I'd expect from a troll trying to stir up conflict. It just feels like a lowbrow move, the kind of move Fox news would move to strip one of Obama's speeches into a socialist polemic by deliberate misinterpretation or something.

Sorry for the rant.
__________________
WARNING: Snek's all up in this thread. Be prepared to read massive walls of text.
Solid Snake is offline Add to Solid Snake's Reputation   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 AM.
The server time is now 01:55:36 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.